The Artist Economy: Episode 06 — Where Do We Draw the Line on AI Music?

The AI debate just became policy.

For years, the music industry argued about whether AI music was “real music.” Now platforms, charts, publishers, and courts are starting to draw actual lines.

Australia introduced a “substantially human-made” requirement for chart eligibility. Apple, Spotify, and Tidal are taking three different approaches to identifying AI music. Meanwhile, publishers are fighting Suno and Anthropic over what the music that trained these systems is actually worth.

Along the way, we ask:

• What does “substantially human-made” actually mean?
• Should AI music compete on the same charts as human artists?
• Is creative agency more important than which tools were used?
• Are songwriters settling before anyone knows what AI training is really worth?
• What happens when machines become technically better than humans?

In this episode, we explore the evolving rules around AI music, artist and songwriter rights, fan-powered remixing, new release models, and what AI and robotics mean for the future of human creativity.

Key Takeaways

• Don’t bet your career on AI staying bad: The technology will only keep improving.
• Use AI without giving up your creative agency: Keep what makes your work uniquely yours.
• Protect your identity and relationships: Your story, voice, and connections still matter.
• Build real community and human connection: As music becomes easier to generate, genuine connection may become more valuable.
• Bet on humans continuing to care about humans: Machines will get better, but human connection is what makes art meaningful.

---

→ Book an Artist Breakthrough Session with the Modern Musician team: https://streetteam.fm/masterclass