
What if changing the scanner or choosing another slide from the same tumor changes your pathology AI results?
In DigiPath Digest #52, I review three studies on pathology foundation models, scanner shift, and slide selection to ask how much of “model performance” comes from the model itself.
We look at a benchmark comparing 32 foundation models across 41 tasks, a study testing 10 models across scanners and centers, and a breast cancer study examining how predictions change when different slides represent the same patient.
The findings challenge familiar assumptions about bigger models, benchmark rankings, and the idea that one slide can represent a heterogeneous tumor. Combining information from multiple slides improved performance in the breast cancer study, without changing the model architecture.
My takeaway: evaluate the model, the data, and the workflow together. I share three practical questions to ask before accepting an AI benchmark score.
Highlights with Timestamps
Resource from this episode
Research papers:
Data resource mentioned: