TTU154: Why Trend Following Isn't Crash Insurance ft. Philippe Jordan

What if one of the biggest misconceptions about trend following is what investors expect it to do? Niels Kaastrup-Larsen and Alan Dunne are joined by Philippe Jordan, President of CFM, for a conversation that challenges conventional thinking about systematic investing. Drawing on 35 years of experience, Philippe explains why even the most sophisticated models sometimes need human judgment, how AI is transforming the search for alpha, and why diversification matters more than any single strategy. They also explore the limits of scientific approaches to markets, the importance of investment culture, and why trend following’s greatest value may have little to do with protecting investors from the next crash.

-----

JOIN THE TREND FOLLOWING MANIFESTO BOOK LAUNCH LIST TO GET SPECIAL LOW PRICE ON OUR UPCOMING BOOK DURING THE FIRST WEEK!

- CLICK HERE

-----

Follow Niels on Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube or via the TTU website.

IT’s TRUE ? – most CIO’s read 50+ books each year – get your FREE copy of the Ultimate Guide to the Best Investment Books ever written here.

And you can get a free copy of my latest book “Ten Reasons to Add Trend Following to Your Portfolio” here.

Learn more about the Trend Barometer here.

Send your questions to [email protected]

And please share this episode with a like-minded friend and leave an honest Rating & Review on iTunes or Spotify so more people can discover the podcast.

Follow Alan on Twitter.

Follow Philippe on LinkedIn.

Find out more about DUNN Capital

Episode Timestamps:

00:00 - Why trend following isn't crash insurance

01:05 - Can investment flows create lasting market edges?

02:33 - Philippe Jordan and the evolution of CFM

08:06 - What scientific models miss during extreme market crises

13:56 - Why CFM moved beyond traditional trend following

16:28 - Scientific rigor and the growing power of technology

20:51 - Why investment culture matters as much as technology

25:05 - How AI agents are transforming quantitative research

28:29 -